Gender differences in mate selection evidence from a speed dating news article about online dating

Multilevel modeling would definitely be useful here, since you have something like 10 binary observations and 6 parameters to estimate for each person.Several months ago I decided to pursue a career in data science, and with a view toward building my skills, I worked to build a model to predict when an individual participant will express interest in seeing a given partner again.Unselective Romantic Desire: Not All Reciprocity is Created Equal, Psychological Science (2007).Elizabeth Epstein and Ruth Guttman, Mate Selection in Man: Evidence, Theory and Outcome, Social Biology (1984).Higher values indicate higher physical attractiveness. In contrast, when the participants were asked to judge their own individual physical attractiveness, both Black men and Black women rated themselves as far more physically attractive than men and women of other races.Ed Diener, Brian Wolsic and Frank Fujita, Physical Attractiveness and Subjective Well-Being, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1995).

The methodology is largely implicit in the code, which is coherently organized, up to some minor changes that I still need to make.

Such data is seldom public, but Columbia business school professors Ray Fisman and Sheena Iyengar compiled a rich and relevant data set for their paper Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence From a Speed Dating Experiment.

Their main results were: Women put greater weight on the intelligence and the race of partner, while men respond more to physical attractiveness.

Raymond Fisman, Sheena Iyengar, Emir Kamenica and Itamar Simonson, Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence from a Speed Dating Experiment, Quarterly Journal of Economics (2006).

Guenter Hitsch, Ali Horta^su and Dan Ariely, What Makes You Click?


Leave a Reply